Are you a Real Christian?

Are you a Real Christian?

R you a Real Christian?-2

Revelation Unleashed Book

Real Christianity

~Echoes of Spirit Radio~

"LaSt DaYS" EaRtHqUaKeS

~Rapture V 2nd Coming~

End Times Misconceptions!

1st 5 Seals of Revelation

1st 5 Seals Page--2

1st 5 Seals Page--- 3

1st 5 Seals Page---4

1st 5 Seals Page --- 5

1st 5 Seals-----Page 6

IMMINENT 6th Seal Rapture

Antichrist Revealed?

"Secret" Rapture Event ??

The "Rapture" Event --2

The "Rapture" Event---3

The "Rapture" Event- 4

The "Rapture Event" - 5

The "Rapture" Event - 6

The "Rapture" Event --7

"Last Trumpet" of Jesus

"Last Trumpet"of Jesus--2

"Last Trumpet" of Jesus-3

"Last Trumpet" of Jesus-4

*Matthew 24 vs. Luke 21*

Is Jesus Delayed ?

Rapture still 2012?

Left Behind-The Rapture

Last BIG Sign? Jerusalem!

The 4th Horsemen spotted!

Signs in the Heavens ??

Ezekiel 38 & 39 Gog Magog

Armageddon- Jesus Return

"Planet X" ???

Satanic Forces Rising

Saved by Faith alone?

Faith Alone?-- 2

Faith alone? ---3

If Atheists are Correct

Jesus the Authoritarian

False Prophet Defined !!!

False Teachers Doctrines

* New False Teachings*

Many False Teachers now!

'The Secret'

The Weeds & The Wheat

Good People

How Great is Our God?

Claiming God's promises

No perfect Church?

The Test

What would Jesus Do?

AD1-AD30 The missing yrs.

What are you addicted to?

Don't Judge me?

Eternal Security/ OSAS

Salvation

Holy Spirit Power

Heaven and Hell Video

New Revelation DVD video

Letter to a Muslim

Recent Question

Blog/ Msg.Board

He Exists Bumper Stickers

Contact Info--About us

Mission What we Believe

Links

The infamous Mark of the Beast (Antichrist)
Yes it coming.........the Mark of the Beast (Antichrist)
The following article was written by a Muslim reporter in 2008.  We are not in the business of naming who we think the antichrist is, or might be, and though he is probably already revealed (which simply and only means uncovered or seen), this does not mean he is positively identified yet.  This positive identification will not likely happen, until after the ready followers of Jesus are taken out of the world at the "great escape" via the Rapture event.  But there are only two possible positive identifiers anyway.  Some think one is, the signing of the seven year peace treaty with Israel.  The problem with that is, he won't be the only one signing it, instead many countries along with the Antichrist will be confirming it.  If he was the only one, we would have an easy identifier. 

Instead the bible says in Revelation chapter 13, he will receive a mortal head wound.  This is a positive identifier.  The other one is he will go into the last temple and defile it and set himself up in it to be worshipped along with setting up the destroying terror, which is likely to be a guillotine to behead the saints and others who oppose him with.  So until the head wound event occurs it is almost a complete waste of time trying to identify who is.  It is interesting to speculate, but being positive with it, is currently impossible. The head wound event is likely to happen sometime between the Rapture and the defilement of the temple which starts the last 3-1/2 years of the tribulation period.  If it happened now, it would be shocking and at least one billion or so Christians would be screaming who he is.

It is very likely that we see the antichrist right now every day in the news.  The fact that he has not yet been positively identified, does not mean he has not been revealed.  You can uncover something in the forest, which is an example of revealing something, but not have it properly identified for what it actually is long afterwards, and this is much the same here. 

The bottom line is we are looking for Jesus, as Paul and the rest of the early church was in the 1st century.  They were not looking for the Antichrist as the "last sign", if it were that easy he would have told us in other scripture.  Also if the Antichrist identification was before the Rapture, it would again negate his coming with the surprise of a thief as he must.

 However, having said all of this, the following is still interesting to ponder.  

By Michael van der Galien from http://www.theatlanticright.com/2008/10/11/louis-farrakhan-calls-barack-obama-the-messiah/ - Last updated: Saturday, October 11, 2008 - 

"Highly controversial Muslim leader in the United States Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam, called
 Barack Obama the Messiah in a sermon recently.

"You are the instruments that God is going to use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth, Farrakhan said. 

And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn't care anything about. Thats a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking, he concluded.

Obama has been accused of the past of having ties to Farrakhan, a highly controversial black Muslim leader. The Obama campaign countered the attacks by denying any true, significant ties.

Although those ties may certainly not exist, one thing is clear: Louis Farrakhan thinks very highly of Barack Obama, he even uses the same words Obama uses frequently".  


End quote

You may think to yourself, that Farrakahn didn't call him the antichrist, but instead he called him "the messiah." However when you are calling someone who certainly is not the messiah, the messiah, then in effect you have just labeled him the antichrist, since the only true messiah will always be Jesus.

Whats also very telling is how Obama does not mind being called the messiah or a messiah in general.  Any true Christian would never take this title on themselves and accept the praise from men, that would go along with that adoration.  But of course a fake Christian filled with pride would have no problem accepting this title and role. 

True Christians who know their Revelation and Daniel prophecies, know that the false prophet(the antichrist's sidekick), will likely be a Muslim, because Revelation 13:11 proclaims:  11"And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon".

This matches what is going on in Islam today where the leader in Iran and others, are calling for the 12th imam who went down into a well (the earth), in the 10th century.  They are saying he is here now, though they have not named him yet.  Well if they are getting ready to unveil him soon, then the antichrist can't be far behind, as far as his positive identification goes.  

              

But where will the antichrist come from?  Revelation 13:1  says he came out of the sea, but it's not the ocean sea, instead it is the sea of humanity which would resemble a democratic nation like the USA.  Revelation 17:1&15 tells us about this "sea" of humanity and tells us the whore of Babylon, who is likely the USA, will sit over and be "in control of" many peoples and nations and influence those peoples with both materialism and the abhorrent sin of pornography and adultery.

It is not a coincidence that the USA is in control of Iraq right now, when the bible in Isaiah 11:4, also calls the antichrist "the Assyrian".  Assyria is ancient and current Iraq.  This does not mean he has to be born there, but somehow he has to be in control of it.  It just so happens the USA is in control of it.  Coincidence?  Not a chance. 

Traditional antichrist teachings say the following below and more, but keeping our eyes open to modern day events and people is important lest we get caught off guard.  Saying so and so can't be the antichrist whoever we may name, is foolish and dangerous and lulls people back into a false sense of security. The antichrist will be in charge of a reconstituted "Roman empire," which the US has long resembled.  However, this does not mean he has to be "from that empire" but simply in charge or control of it.  Revelation again tells us the ten reconstituted nations or possibly regional powers, will give their power to the antichrist for one hour which is 3-1/2, or possibly the entire seven year tribulation period in biblical end times prophecy.

In Revelation 13:18 it says anyone with wisdom find the meaning of the number of the beast and the beast is the antichrist. His number will be the number of a man which is 666. So it already tells us in the scripture that it's a man. It does not say in this passage to go out and try to figure out who is precisely through numerical code. It is simply saying it is a man and not an actual beast, because if it didn't, people would think it is an actual beast because of the many times the phrase "beast" is used in the passage.

But there will be other things far easier to identify the antichrist by, than mathematically which is a waste of time anyway. One is, he will receive a mortal head wound and appear to be dead, then come back to life (almost Christ like).  One verse passage that refers to this is (Rev 13:11-12)

"Then I saw another beast coming up out of the Earth,

              and spoke like a dragon.

              And he exercises all the authority

              of the first beast [the Antichrist] in his presence,

              and causes the Earth and those who dwell in it

              to worship the first beast [the Antichrist],

              whose deadly [head] wound was healed." 

The other is the "confirmation" of the seven year peace agreement with Israel and her enemies.  However, this does not necessarily mean he initiates it, instead he may just be a tag along saying in effect "me too,"just so he can claim to be part of the process.  Also since he won't be the only one signing it, this signing by itself won't be enough to positively identify him.  Another thing the antichrist will do, is seek to have the times and God's law changed, see Daniel 7:25. This can certainly include the many laws that are being changed already here in America by executive order now.  Abortion laws are being overturned and they are looking to reinstate the 'fairness' doctrine which would change the FCC laws of free speech to silence Christians and other critics especially.

But whoever it is, he will be identified very soon now and many will be able to point to the identification and it will be very clear for all to see.  In 2nd Thessalonians below, we see some in Jesus day thought Jesus had already come the 2nd time, but Paul assured them this could not be the case because the antichrist had not yet been revealed nor had the great rebellion  from the truth occurred yet.  We need to realize revealed does not necessarily mean identified, but could be as simple as being born, just as Jesus was.  If you recall Jesus was revealed at his birth but he was not identified for who he really was until long afterward.

2 Thessalonians 2:1-4 which is a greatly misinterpreted passage reads: - "Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers, not to become easily unsettled or alarmed by some prophecy, report or letter supposed to have come from us, saying that the day of the Lord has already come. Don't let anyone deceive you in any way, for (that day will not come) until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshiped, so that he sets himself up in God's temple, proclaiming himself to be God.

Because this is the last generation that will see the end of all things, the Antichrist must be on the scene already somewhere, though possibly not in the place of final power. Again revealed does not mean identified and the rebellion or falling away from truth is well under way and has been here in America at least since prayer was legally removed from American schools decades ago. This has been a slow falling away but a falling away none the less.  There will be another more clear and final turning away after the 6th seal is broken which will give rise to the antichrist's final rise to power, but we can not assume or add to the scriptures the way some do.  


Some assume that the antichrist must take his seat of power in the tribulation temple before Jesus Raptures his bride, but this is not what the scripture is saying in this passage at all.  If that were the case it would negate Jesus coming as a thief.

The last portion of 2 Thess 2:4 says he (the antichrist), will set himself up in God's temple and proclaim to be God, but no where in this passage does it say that this must occur before the Rapture.  But unless you know all your prophecy passages from other scripture you would not know how to separate this passage as well.  "He will oppose........"
is future from what Paul was talking about previously, and must be separated from the previous statement. 


There are other passages in the bible like this too. 2 Peter 3:10 in describing what happens starting at the 6th seal and beyond reads : "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens will pass away with a great noise and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up".  So does this mean all of these happen all at once?  No of course not. Peter is spanning what starts happening at the 6th seal all the way through to the end where God makes a new heavens and new earth by burning the old with fire.


This again shows the importance of knowing all of scripture and how is fits into the time line of Revelation. The time line of Revelation which begins at the first seal,  is the master plan that all else gets plugged into.  It supersedes all previous prophecy as far as the timeline goes.  Since we know the Rapture occurs at the 6th seal, we can then see that the Antichrist does not come to power until later in Chapter 13 of Revelation.  That means a mid-tribulation Rapture would be far too obvious an event for Jesus to come as a thief as he must.

Let me give you an example of what some mid or post-tribbers do to bolster their positions:


I just read an article in Charisma Magazine by a gentleman named Francis Frangipane which reads as follows and is in regards to 2 Thess 2:1-4:  Francis said " Paul stated plainly that the day of the Lord won't come unless the man of sin is revealed "first".  This is the first problem with this mans interpretation. Paul did not say "first". Francis added this word because he and others like him want to.  


Then Francis said: "The antichrist will actually take his seat in "the temple of God" and he will display himself as being God". 

 

Francis and others like him, add to and take away from scripture by not reading and understanding it completely and literally.  We know by other scripture that the Lord has to come as a thief.  If he were to come after the Antichrist is so easily identified, it would negate this important truth, so we can't ever do that.


Then Francis goes on to say :  "These events will be open, irrefutable realities, not types and shadows, that will precede the Lords return. They will not be cryptic; they will be open."


So Francis is half right in one aspect, but it contradicts other scripture that says Jesus is coming as a thief.  Because the storming of the Temple by the Antichrist will be so blatant and in the open, Jesus has to Rapture his ready followers beforehand.  Since we already know this occurs earlier at the 6th seal, it makes sense, but it makes no sense when some take these events out of the original order they were meant to stay in.


Paul and the rest of the early church were not looking for the antichrist as a sign.  He knew that would be a sign to the Jews and the left behind, but not the Rapture ready followers.  They were looking for Jesus alone and thought that it could occur at any moment.  How could this be possible if Paul knew that the antichrist must desecrate the temple first?  The answer is, Paul knew that the Rapture was first, not the positive identification of the Antichrist.  


If you think the tribulation does not start until the desecration of the temple, then you will be twisted in the rest of your theology as well.  The tribulation starts when the bible says it does which is at the beginning of God's wrath at the 6th seal, not after.




RealChristian.net and all information contained on this website is copywritten and all rights are reserved.  However, permission is granted to copy, reproduce and further distribute any material on these pages for non-commercial purposes, not including links outside this Web page © Thank you. RealChristian.net 2007 ©

Web Hosting powered by Network Solutions®

Are you a Real Christian?